Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (scotus)

In this case the AEDPA and Brect must BOTH be followed.

The requirement to read a sign to determine it’s compliance, by reference to the sign’s location, with a city ordinance banning off premises advertising, does not infringe 1a freedom of speech.

My limited understanding: Sovereign entities sued under FSIA (but without a separate cause of action implicating federal jurisdiction) are subject to the choice of law provision of the courts which would otherwise be the lawsuit’s venue.Eg. Where you would have had to bring the underlying, non-FSIA/non-federal, Lawsuit where you found the law.

Lawsuit may proceed.

Sections 9 and 10 do not contain “look through” provisions 

Texas’s rule against pastor laying hands on and praying with a prisoner in his final moments during a state execution is a violation of the religious land use and institutionalized persons act of 2000.

Free speech not implicated by deliberative body censure.

The Wisc Supreme Court did not properly consider the race based changes to the voting map.

This is not about abortion, it’s about procedure.

State Secrets wins.

where where one short duration crime ends and another begins nearly simultaneously the crimes are not separate “occasions” for ACCA purposes.

§411(a)’s safeharbor protects unknowing errors of law AND fact.

The trial court violated the Petitioner’s 6th Amendment right to confront witnesses against him.

For purposes here Only Babcock’s National Guard service payments are payments for service “as a member of a uniformed service” not his technicians pay.

The Court stays a stay of a vaccine mandate for Medicare and Medicaid facility employees.

Granting a stay of OSHA’s vaccine mandate.